Home | Blog | MySpace | Facebook | YouTube | Too Smart To Fail:
The Forum | We Need a 32 Team Playoff in
College Football!!
The PAP Book | The PAP Sheets | How To Use PAP | IRS Documentation |
Free PAP Sheets | PAP ROI Page | Contact | How the success of Tampa
can help The Meadowlands
How I Lost 42 Lbs In 18
Weeks | The Fine Art Of The
Miniature | Help Wanted: Female | Between Jackpots | Bettor Off Single | Price and Probability | JUICERS! A Short Novella
(Volume I)
Bettor Off Single: Why
Commitment Is a Bad Gamble For Men by Ray Gordon!!
Get the Book FREE!!
New Editorial:
How the success of Tampa Bay Downs can help The Meadowlands by
Walt Gekko
What if the Dodgers had
never moved to Los Angeles from Brooklyn?
By Walt
Gekko, associate for the Price and Probability
method
This
originally came out of having listened to some considerable
discussion of the Dodgers and their move from Brooklyn to Los
Angeles following the 1957 season following the February 27
passing of Edwin (Duke) Snider, mainly from those old enough to
have been alive when the Dodgers were still in Brooklyn:
With the passing of Duke Snider, the last surviving regular
player of the Brooklyn Dodger teams that were beloved prior to
their move to LA, there have been many remembrances from people
old enough to actually remember when the Dodgers played at Ebbets
Field, along with those who to this day feel Brooklyn has never
been the same without the Dodgers.
Many who were alive then even in 2011 still blame the late Robert
Moses (a man who from the 1920s-early 60s did a lot
of things that were necessary, but also did a lot of things with
no regard to others that New York is still paying for in many
ways to this day) for the Dodgers moving to LA. For much of
the disregard Moses may have had on a lot of things (particularly
to many today, his total disdain for public transportation) , his
refusal to get Walter oMalley the land necessary to build a
privately funded domed stadium on the Atlantic Yards was not
Moses simple refusal to do so as many old-time Dodger fans
believe: It actually was illegal for Moses to do the kind
of eminent domain being done in 2011 to build what eventually
will be the new home of what will become the Brooklyn Nets, the
Barclays Center. Moses was not willing to openly break laws
like that as much as he had done eminent domain (that in the
process ruined many neighborhoods throughout New York, including
in the eyes of many the South Bronx that in many ways still has
not recovered from the building of the Cross-Bronx Expressway
that like other highways actually was needed at that time) to
build the Dodgers the domed stadium they desired, prompting the
move to Los Angeles along with all the other unintended
consequences of all of the other things Moses did over the many
years he was in (sometimes) absolute power of New York City.
This is not about re-hashing old stuff. This is about how
different baseball and football might very well have been
different if the Dodgers had NOT moved to LA after the 1957
season.
Say that instead of moving to LA, the Dodgers agree to have
Ebbets Field completely renovated (which was going to be needed
for the Dodgers to remain there, even if supposedly the real
reason the OMalleys wanted out of there was because the
neighborhood was changing). The lack of parking was an
obvious problem, especially at a time when cars were becoming
more affordable and people were moving to the suburbs (the same
reason that the old Penn Station would be torn down a few years
later to the disdain of many to build a new Madison Square
Garden, although that really was because the Pennsylvania
Railroad was severely cash-strapped by then) was also a problem,
but say something could have been done where parking could have
taken place at a remote site and the transfer that is now in
place at the Botanical Gardens Subway station between the
Franklin Avenue Shuttle (that has always stopped there) and the
IRT 2, 3, 4 and 5 trains was built much earlier than it actually
was in the late 1990s as a compromise so people could do a
park-and-ride and take the subway from that location to Ebbets
Field. While the lack of parking concessions would have
eventually done in Ebbets Field, it at least could have proven to
be a stop-gap measure that, along with a renovated stadium could
have kept Ebbets Field in operation through the 1960s into
the early 70s, with OMalley then getting his chance
to build his domed stadium on the Atlantic Yards site in a
post-Moses era, with that stadium opening in say
1972-73.
While some also blame Moses for the Giants moving out of New York
with the Dodgers to the west coast, it needs to be noted even if
the Dodgers had stayed in Brooklyn, the Giants (who were drawing
very poorly at The Polo Grounds in upper Manhattan) were moving
regardless. The Giants were looking at that time to move to
Minneapolis-St. Paul, which at that time was the home of their
AAA affiliate (this was in the pre-expansion era when there were
only 16 teams, eight per league in all of Major League Baseball),
and that move likely would have happened after the 1957 or
58 season (the Giants would have been playing their games
in the Twin Cities at Metropolitan Stadium, which was in
existence from 1956-81 before moving with the Vikings to
The Metrodome, which was the actual home of the Twins from
1982-2009 before the Twins moved to Target Field for the 2010
season).
Assuming that had happened after the 1957 season, the likely
scenario for the Dodgers would have been this:
Play the 1958 season at their enemys old home, The Polo
Grounds, while Ebbets Field was being re-built.
Play from 1959 through the early 70s at Ebbets Field,
waiting out Moses so that a later administration (not as
concerned on eminent domain or with the laws changed) would allow
OMalley to build the domed stadium he wanted to at the
Atlantic Rail Yards that say again opens either in 1972 or
73.
That said, there are a whole bunch of other things that likely
wind up happening if the Dodgers remained in Brooklyn affecting
baseball and the NFL over time:
The most notable of these is that Shea Stadium (which of course
became home of the Mets from 1964-2008 and along with Citi Field
since 2009 is as much a part of the claim to fame of the 7 line
as any) is likely never built, and we likely never have the Mets
and their improbable World Series runs of 1969 (when they won it
all) and 73 (when they won the NL Pennant with what is
still the worst record of any team ever to make the World
Series), not to mention 1986, which may still be the greatest
single season team in baseball history.
Another involves the Jets. With Shea likely not being built
at that time, the Jets (who played in the Polo Grounds from
1960-62 as the Titans of New York and as the Jets in 1963)
likely play 1-2 seasons in Yankee Stadium or Ebbets Field while
the Polo Grounds undergoes a complete rebuild into a modern (by
1964-66 standards), football-only stadium for the Jets, who
along the way likely in later years share the stadium with the
Cosmos of the old North American Soccer League. If
this happens, it is quite conceivable that then-Jets owner Leon
Hess does not move the Jets across the Hudson to The Meadowlands
in 1984, especially if the Jets have complete control over
parking, concessions, and in what would likely be another rebuild
of the Polo Grounds in the 1980s-early 90s, luxury boxes
that were en vogue by then if not by that point moving into a new
stadium on the site of what was Shea Stadium (and near where Citi
Field currently stands). This in turn likely leaves the
Giants (who were likely moving to The Meadowlands anyway back in
the 70s) by the late 2000s either with having to rebuild
the old Giants Stadium (that had only opened in 1976) or building
the new Meadowlands Stadium without the help of the Jets, with
whom they co-own the new stadium with.
Its not just New York that would have been affected,
however:
With the Dodgers staying in Brooklyn and the Giants likely having
moved to the Twin Cities instead of San Francisco, the focus on
LA would have stayed where it may actually have been all along,
and that was luring the original Washington Senators to Los
Angeles. The late Calvin Griffith from known accounts
apparently wanted out of D.C. at that time and very possibly
would have been the owner who moved his team to LA instead of
OMalley. As the Senators were an American League
team, that likely means in expansion that actually came with the
1961 season (mainly to replace the original Senators team that
actually became the Twins then in Washington) might have come
earlier, and NOT with the Angels coming in with the new Senators
as the second team. With the original Senators in LA (most
likely under a new name, possibly the Angels that did land in LA
in the 1961 expansion), the likely second team in an American
League expansion to me would have been in San Francisco, possibly
taking the name of the longtime Pacific Coast League (AAA) team
that pre-dated the Giants there, the Seals (and that expansion
might have been earlier than when it actually did in 1961 since
the original Senators might very well have moved from Washington
to LA before they actually did to the Twin Cities if the Dodgers
stayed in Brooklyn). The National League, in turn realizing
what they were missing by not having a team on the west coast,
likely counters with expansion of its own, at that time most
likely adding its own LA team that very possibly would have been
the team we know today as the Angels in the American League
(though most likely under a different name since the original
Senators might very well have taken the Angels name if they had
moved to LA), along with the team that actually came into the
National League with the Mets, the Houston Colt .45s (who became
the Astros when they moved into the Astrodome in 1965), with that
expansion possibly happening before the expansion that brought
the Mets and Colt .45s/Astros into existence actually did for the
1962 season.
From
there, what happened next also might very well have been
different in baseball. Assuming the expansions happened as
noted, there then was the issue of the As in Kansas City,
having moved there from Philadelphia in 1955. Their
continued losing was creating problems for then-owner Charlie
Finley, and he was looking to move the team by 1967. With
the Oakland Alameda County Coliseum having opened a year earlier
in 1966, Oakland seemed like a logical landing point, but in this
scenario, there would have been one problem: Assuming the
American League put an expansion team in San Francisco to go with
the original Senators having moved to LA in earlier moves, it was
likely the American League would be reluctant to have a repeat on
the west coast of the Baltimore-Washington setup that would
actually be in place until the second Senators team moved to
Dallas in 1972 and became the Texas Rangers. The As
might very well have been able to move to Oakland as they
actually did for the 1968 season, but there might have been some
ripple effects of that as well, including a brokered deal where
the As moved from the American to the National League,
becoming the first team to change leagues in the modern era of
baseball (something the Milwaukee Brewers actually would do 30
years later in 1998).
With an odd number of teams in each league (9 in the American
League and possibly 11 in the National League by that time), if
the As move did occur in 1968 as it actually did, the next
round of expansion and the move to divisional play that happened
in 1969 might have happened one year earlier in 68.
The likely teams that actually did come in for the 1969
expansion (Montreal Expos), Seattle Pilots, Kansas City Royals
and San Diego Padres) would have, but the one difference might
have been that the Padres would have been the lone team to enter
the National League, while the Expos (now Nationals) would have
joined the Pilots (now Brewers) and Royals as new American League
teams.
The divisions in 1968 (assuming the division era would have
started one year earlier than it actually did) might very well
have looked like this:
AL East
Yankees
Red Sox
Orioles
Senators
Expos
Tigers
AL West
San Francisco (Seals?)
Los Angeles (ex-Senators, perhaps Angels)
Royals
White Sox
Pilots
Indians
NL East
(Brooklyn) Dodgers
Phillies
Braves
Reds
(Minneapolis-St. Paul) Giants
Pirates
NL West
Los Angeles (Angels?)
As
Cardinals
Cubs
Astros
Padres
Would the National League have allowed Finley and the innovations
he wanted to bring into baseball to move the As into the
National League with a move from KC to Oakland?
Maybe-maybe not, but I suspect in the end they would have
to get a second team on the west coast along with the Padres
coming into MLB one season earlier than they actually did since
the stadium the Padres actually played in from 1969-2003
(originally San Diego Stadium, later Jack Murphy and currently
Qualcomm Stadium, which is still home to the Chargers) actually
opened in the fall of 1967 (with the old Pacific Coast League
Padres playing one final season in that stadium in 68).
Obviously, if all of the above happened, we:
Might not have had a Cardinals-Tigers World Series in 1968 since
the Cardinals (assuming they won the NL West) and Tigers
(assuming they won the AL East) might not have met since the
Cardinals would likely have had to face the Giants (who would
have won the NL East in 68 in this scenario) and either San
Francisco, LA or even the Indians (who actually finished the best
of the actual teams that would have been in this incarnation of
an AL West in 1968) in the new League Championship Series (which
also would have started a year earlier) first. The Giants
in particular might have upset the Cardinals in the LCS as they
actually were the second place team overall in the NL in 1968.
Would never have had the Mets win the 1969 or 1986 World Series
or National League Pennant in 1973 or 2000, since they never
would have been in existence.
Might not have had the As win their three championships
from 1972-74 since in the National League, they likely
would have had to deal with The Big Red Machine Reds
of that era or a Brooklyn Dodger team in the NLCS, and the
results might very well have been different.
I could go on, but the point is, if the Dodgers had NOT moved to
LA after the 1957 season, everything else, not just in baseball
but even possibly ALL of sports would have moved in a completely
different universe from the one we know. It just shows how
the Dodgers moving to LA (and the Giants to San Francisco) after
the 1957 season in many ways had far more effects than just the
moving to the west coast.
Want To Discuss This Topic? Do so on The Too Smart To Fail Message Board!
Price and Probability (Horse Racing
Site), a revolutionary approach to value handicapping!!
Bettor Off Single: Why
Commitment Is a Bad Gamble For Men by Ray Gordon!!
Get the Book FREE!!
New Editorial:
How the success of Tampa Bay Downs can help The Meadowlands by
Walt Gekko